⚖️U.S. Commerce Announced Amended Antidumping Duty Order on Wind Towers
On January 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy v. United States, Court No. 21-00449, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand redetermination pertaining to the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of utility scale wind towers (wind towers) from Spain covering the period of investigation (POI) July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final determination in that investigation, and that Commerce is amending the final determination and the resulting antidumping duty (AD) order with respect to the dumping margin for the collapsed entity which consists of: Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE); Windar Renovables S.A. (Windar); and five of Windar's affiliates (i.e., Tadarsa Eolica SL; Windar Offshore SL; Windar Wind Services SL; Aemsa Santana SA; and Apoyos Metalicos SA) (collectively, SGRE/Windar). Commerce is also amending the dumping margin assigned to all other producers and exporters of subject merchandise.
Learn More🐟Partial Revocation of Antidumping Duty on Frozen Fish Fillets
On January 24, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a partial revocation of Vinh Hoan Corporation (Vinh Hoan) from the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain frozen fish fillets (fish fillets) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam). As a result of this partial revocation, Commerce is rescinding the review with respect to entries that were produced and exported by Vinh Hoan.
Learn More⚙️Scheduling of Final Phase for Countervailing Duty Investigations
The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-729-730 and 731-TA-1698-1699 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of brake drums from China and Turkey, provided for in subheading 8708.30.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") to be subsidized and sold at less-than-fair- value.
Learn More🛏️Antidumping Duty Order on Mattresses from China Review Results
As a result of this expedited sunset review, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on mattresses from the People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the dumping margins identified in the "Final Results of Review" section of this notice.
Learn More⚖️Notice on Vanillin Antidumping and Countervailing Investigations
The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigations Nos. 701-TA-728 and 731-TA-1697 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of vanillin from China, provided for in subheadings 2912.41.00 and 2912.42.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") to be subsidized and sold at less-than-fair- value.
Learn More⚖️Antidumping Duty Notice for Circular Welded Steel Pipe Imports
On January 15, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Wheatland Tube v. United States, Court no. 22-00160, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s first remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) covering the period November 1, 2019 through October 31, 2020. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel), Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai), and the companies not selected for individual examination.
Learn More📜Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Sunset Reviews Notification
The U.S. Department of Commerce announces upcoming Sunset Reviews for antidumping and countervailing duty orders, set for March 2025. These reviews assess the potential continuation of duties on specific imported products from China and Mexico. Stakeholders are encouraged to participate and submit comments, adhering to outlined deadlines and procedural requirements for effective engagement in the review process.
Learn More📊Compliance Requirements for Antidumping and Countervailing Duties
The document outlines procedures for requesting administrative reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders, emphasizing the importance of timely submissions by interested parties. It details the selection process for respondents, deadlines for requests, and implications for businesses involved in international trade, highlighting the administrative framework guiding these reviews.
Learn More⚖️New Antidumping Duty Orders on Melamine Imports Effective January 2025
Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing the antidumping duty orders on melamine from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, and Trinidad and Tobago.
Learn More🏭Rescission of Antidumping Duty Review on OCTG from China
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the People's Republic of China (China) for the period of review (POR) May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024, because, as explained below, there are no suspended entries for the two companies subject to this review.
Learn More