Trendpublic

⚖️ITC Notice

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review a final initial determination ("FID") of the presiding chief administrative law judge ("CALJ") finding no violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated.

📺Investigation into Patent Infringement of Glass Substrates for LCDs

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on January 31, 2025, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of company, city, state or country. A supplement was filed on February 3, 2025. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain glass substrates for liquid crystal displays, products containing the same, and methods for manufacturing the same by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,851,394 ("the '394 patent"), U.S. Patent No. 8,642,491 ("the '491 patent") and U.S. Patent No. 8,640,498 ("the '498 patent"). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order.

☀️Notice on Solar Cells Regulatory Update Involving Adani and Mundra

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 8) granting an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent Adani Green Energy Ltd. based on withdrawal of the complaint, and to amend the complaint to add respondent Mundra Solar PV Ltd.

🥤Investigation Notice for Electrolyte Beverages Trademark Violations

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 27, 2024, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of CAB Enterprises, Inc. of Houston, Texas, Sueros y Bebidas Rehidratantes, S.A. de C.V. of Mexico, Brazos River Ventures LLC of Albany, New York, and Electrolit Manufacturing USA Inc. of Albany, New York. A supplement to the Complaint was filed on January 15, 2025. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electrolyte containing beverages and labeling and packaging thereof by reason of infringement of one of more of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,222,726 ("the '726 mark"); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,833,885 ("the '885 mark"); U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,717,350 ("the '350 mark"); and U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,717,232 ("the '232 mark") (collectively, "Asserted Trademarks"). The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders.

📈Trade Commission Ruling on Quartz Products from China – Implications for Businesses