Rule 8 Jul 2025 commerce, regulation, administrative practice and procedure, technology, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, small businesses, usa, freedom of information, business, courts, inventions and patents, biologics, patent, trademark

📈Increase in Annual Limit for Prioritized Patent Examination Requests

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) includes provisions for prioritized examination of patent applications. Those provisions have been implemented by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in previous rulemakings. The AIA provides that the USPTO may not accept more than 10,000 requests for prioritization in any fiscal year (October 1 to September 30) until regulations setting another limit are prescribed. In 2019 and 2021, the USPTO published interim rules that expanded the limit on the number of requests to 12,000 and 15,000, respectively. The current final rule further expands the availability of prioritized examination by increasing the limit on the number of prioritized examination requests that may be accepted in a fiscal year to 20,000.

Learn More
Rule 10 Jun 2025 administrative practice and procedure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, business strategy, small businesses, freedom of information, patent law, courts, uspto, inventions and patents, biologics, accelerated examination, track one

📜Discontinuation of Accelerated Examination Program for Utilities

In order to efficiently allocate examination-related resources to address pendency, and in view of the low number of requests for Accelerated Examination and the availability of a statutory program to expedite the prosecution of applications (Track One, prioritized examination), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is discontinuing the Accelerated Examination program for utility applications. The USPTO is also modifying the rules of practice to clarify the grounds for which a petition to make special may be granted and when a fee is required for such petition.

Learn More
Rule 19 May 2025 environmental protection, epa, regulatory changes, administrative practice and procedure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, incorporation by reference, natural gas, penalties, environmental compliance, freedom of information, confidential business information, government employees, courts, petroleum, greenhouse gases, emissions reporting

🌍Congressional Review Act Revocation of Waste Emissions Charge

Congress has passed and the President has signed a joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule titled, "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions" (2024 WEC Final Rule). The 2024 WEC Final Rule implemented and facilitated compliance with the requirements of the Waste Emissions Charge in the Clean Air Act's (CAA) Methane Emissions Reduction Program. Under the joint resolution and by operation of the CRA, the 2024 WEC Final Rule now has no legal force or effect. Because the rule has been nullified, the EPA is removing it from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This action is exempt from notice-and-comment rulemaking because it is ministerial in nature.

Learn More
Regulatory Compliance, Financial Impact 21 Jan 2025 compliance, administrative practice and procedure, privacy act, federal government, freedom of information, privacy, government employees, courts, regulatory updates, ceq, foia

📜Analysis of CEQ FOIA and Privacy Act Regulations Impact on Businesses

The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is finalizing its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regulations to incorporate amendments to the FOIA set forth in the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016; to conform to guidance for Federal agencies from the Department of Justice; to make them easier for the public to understand and use; and to better reflect CEQ's current policy and practice. These final regulations reaffirm CEQ's commitment to providing the fullest possible disclosure of records to the public. In addition, CEQ is amending its regulations implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 (the Privacy Act) to make them easier for the public to understand and use and to better reflect CEQ's current policy and practice. These final regulations also make administrative changes, including reorganizing, renumbering, and renaming the sections of CEQ's current FOIA and Privacy Act regulations. CEQ considered all of the public comments received on its proposed rule and made changes in response in this final rule.

Learn More
Compliance, Regulatory Changes 13 Jan 2025 compliance, regulations, homeland security, freedom of information, privacy, classified information, government employees, courts, social security

🔒DHS Proposes Changes to Social Security Number Regulations and Compliance

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS or Department) is proposing to amend its regulations under the Privacy Act of 1974 consistent with the Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017. In addition, DHS is proposing to amend the rules regarding including a Social Security number on physical mail only when necessary to further define "necessary" and provide instructions on redaction of social security numbers when feasible.

Learn More